This sensitive topic has been subject of heated debate for decades.

The opening of Marine Land Studio in Florida in 1930 created a craze for aquariums and zoos in North America, Europe and Australia. Researchers then capitalized on the opportunity to study whales up close, rather than from the surface. These aquarium studies have provided many discoveries (both in whales and other species) in diverse aspects such as communication, acoustics, brain functions, echolocation, sleep, behaviour, etc. Additionally, such research has led to a number of conservation efforts in the wild. For example, studies on cetacean hearing have revealed the impact of noise pollution on dolphins as well as seals. Findings on the cognitive abilities of dolphins have fascinated many.

Some of these discoveries have recently rekindled the controversy: are dolphins too intelligent to be kept in a cage? This question is at the centre of new debates on ethics and animal rights.

It is more difficult and costly to keep whales in an aquarium. Doing so requires quality food, specific veterinary care, sufficiently large enclosures and an efficient water treatment system. As these standards are difficult to achieve, the living conditions of the animals in some facilities are not always optimal. Mortality rates in aquariums are generally higher than in the wild.

Many counter-argue by pointing out the educational value of encounters that people have with whales and dolphins in aquariums. Some aquariums offer programs that deliver messages promoting the protection of these animals and the conservation of their habitat, which contrast with the more clownish shows offered.

Within the scientific community, opinions vary. Some argue that breakthroughs in research would not be possible without aquarium studies. Indeed, we know much less about baleen whales such as rorquals since they have only been studied in their natural habitat. Others state that it is possible to obtain significant results in the wild without disturbing the animals’ behaviour.

According to Robert Michaud (GREMM), if we opt to keep animals in captivity, whether in a zoo or an aquarium, it is our responsibility to ensure optimal living conditions for the animals, a transfer of knowledge through research, and the presence of educational programs. Pierre Béland (St. Lawrence National Institute of Ecotoxicology) highlights the importance of preserving habitat before the species themselves, as the main threat to these declining species is the degradation of their natural habitat, which is often attributable to Man.

To learn more:

 Arguments for and against captivity according to Pierre Béland (in French)

Are dolphins too smart to be held in captivity?

Captive breeding according to Robert Michaud (in French)

A legally protected killer whale in captivity (in French)

A current bill in Canada to gradually phase out the captivity of whales and dolphins (in French)

Whale Q&A - 10/8/2015

Camille Bégin Marchand

Camille Bégin Marchand has been employed for GREMM from 2013 to 2018. Although she began as a naturalist at the Marine Mammal Interpretation Centre, Camille’s interest in scientific writing would later land her a position on the Whales Online editorial team. With a passion for biology and a deep affection for the region, she is also pursuing a Master’s degree in forest sciences in collaboration with the Tadoussac Bird Observatory (OOT).

Recommended articles

Are whales diurnal or nocturnal?

Within the animal kingdom, most species adjust their periods of sleep and activity according to a repeated 24-hour cycle called…

|Whale Q&A 22/7/2020

How do whales go months without eating?

When fall returns, the humpbacks of the St. Lawrence head to the Caribbean for the winter. In the space of…

|Whale Q&A 14/7/2020

Can we rid whales of their pollution?

Pollution can accumulate in whales' bodies and cause them serious health problems. “Can we flush this pollution out of a…

|Whale Q&A 18/6/2020